 Frank S. Rossi, PhD |
Light at the end of the tunnel
Turfgrass researchers from throughout the country and around the
world gather every year to discuss the latest research projects
during the annual meetings of the Crop Science Society of America.
At this year’s meetings, held earlier this month in New Orleans,
updates were given on more than 230 research projects. That is less
than half of all the turfgrass research projects in progress across
the country.
My favorite projects are exploratory types related to the future of
golf turf management. I liken these to shining a light in a dark
tunnel: They might not provide overall relief from the darkness, but
they allow you to see the end of the tunnel. However, those endpoints
might be interim stops along the way as progress continues.
I measure progress in golf turf management in terms of efficiency and
precision – energy efficiency, resource efficiency, labor efficiency,
and how we minimize inputs and meet performance expectations.
Increased precision will lead to improved efficiency.
Every year there are research projects focusing on a particular
subject area that dominate the meetings. A few that come to mind are
papers on environmental fate studies and Primo. This year it was
remote-sensing technology.
 Remote-sensing technology, such as the GreenSeeker (shown
adjacent to the operator's seat here) can be an add-on to existing
mowing machinery. PHOTO COURTESY OF NTECH INDUSTRIES | There are several definitions of remote sensing. My favorite comes
from “Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation” (Wiley, 1999) by
Thomas M. Lillesand, Ralph W. Kiefer, and Jonathan W. Chipman. The
authors write that remote sensing “is the science and art of
obtaining information about an object, area, or phenomenon through
the analysis of data acquired by a device that is not in contact with
the object, area, or phenomenon under investigation.”
What I like about this definition is that it includes the word “art.”
This implies that while this is a data-driven process, there still is
a human element that engages our instinct or knack for a subject.
This human component lies at the heart of the success of this
technology and its ability to improve our precision.
Most of the studies presented in this arena used a remote sensing
device to assess the spectral analysis of the turf. Essentially the
device assesses the color of the grass not just in the range that we
can see visually but also in the range of colors that are not visible
to the naked eye. A machine’s ability to determine changes in color
not visible to humans might allow for enhanced ability to detect
problems.
The light at the end the tunnel for me is remote-sensing
technology connected to GPS technology.
Several studies set up nitrogen deficiencies, drought conditions or
disease-like symptoms to “ground-true” the remote sensing. Once the
treatments were established the device was set up to “sense” the plot
from above it as soil and turfgrass quality ratings manually were
being collected to determine soil moisture and the visual effect on
the turf.
The unique aspect of these studies is the ability to detect the
imposed stress on the plants six to 24 hours before that stress was
visible to the human eye. There are many confounding factors such as
ambient light, moisture, varying turf types, etc., that can effect
the precision of the measurement.
This technology is widely used in production agriculture to improve
yield (an easy-to-measure output). However, in the golf turf
management determining our yield, or goal, is not as easy, unless it
simply is “greenness.”
Companies such as The Toro Co. and NTech Industries, makers of
GreenSeeker, have invested a significant amount of resources into
remote sensing in conjunction with many turfgrass researchers. Remote-
sensing technology will be an add-on to mowing equipment.
The light at the end the tunnel for me is remote-sensing technology
connected to GPS technology.
For example, the turf is “sensed” during mowing, and the information
on pending nitrogen stress is collected, downloaded and analyzed in
seconds. The stressed locations are pinpointed, a tank of fertilizer
is mixed and the spray tech is on his way. GPS technology activates
the sprayer only where fertilizer is needed delivering nutrients to a
precise area.
Fertigation might make it easier to run a few heads to help deliver
the nutrients. Although that technique probably is less precise it is
more efficient.
Not only will the turf stay healthy and retain its color, you also
will avoid other problems associated with nitrogen deficiency. For
example, a group of Ohio State University researchers, including
plant pathologist Mike Boehm, Ph.D., have shown that short-term drops
in turf nitrogen status can lead to increased dollar spot disease.
You will be able to avoid unnecessary pesticide applications if you
can “sense” such problems before you can see them.
If you’re worried that such technology would make the superintendent
obsolete, I believe such advancements will further enhance the
superintendent’s stature, not diminish it.
As superintendents are asked continually to do more with less such
technology will reduce the need for “rescue” treatments.
Technological advancements typically alleviate monotonous tasks and
allow for enhanced efficiency and increased reliance on knowledge and
less on products.
Now that is a light at the end of the tunnel.
Frank S. Rossi, Ph.D., is associate professor of turfgrass science at Cornell University in Ithaca, N.Y. He can be reached at fsr3@cornell.edu.
|
Featured columns
Frank S. Rossi, Ph.D. - Gazing in the Grass
Bradley S. Klein - Rough Draft
Randy Wilson - Breakroom
Peter L. McCormick - View from the Cheap Seats
|
|